High CourtsSingle Bench

Deepak Chimwal vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 27 February 2023 · Citation: (2023) 02 UK CK 0104

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Forest Act, 1927 — Section 26, 52 · Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 — Section 39, 51
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 418 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 254 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Deepak Chimwal is in judicial custody in FIR No.18 of 2023 (Range Case No.7/Daichori/2022-23), under Sections 26 and 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and Sections 39 and 51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, Police Station- Kaladungi, District- Nainital. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

According to the FIR, on 27.01.2023, 9 kgs elephant tusk were recovered from the custody of the applicant and co-accused, which they had kept in a private vehicle.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that there is no independent witness; applicant is innocent; he is not a previous convict; applicant wife is expecting a child in the month of April.

5.

Learned State Counsel would submit that it is the case of recovery of elephant tusk from the applicant and the co-accused. But he would agree that the bail rejection order does not reveal any previous conviction of the applicant.

6.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

7.

The bail application is allowed.

8.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

9.

Let a certified copy of this order be supplied to learned counsel for the parties, today itself, on payment of usual charges.