High CourtsSingle Bench

Deepak Kumar vs State Of Delhi

Delhi High Court · Decided on 14 February 2020 · Citation: (2020) 02 DEL CK 0258

HON’BLE JUDGES
Brijesh Sethi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 164, 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 328, 376D, 384, 506
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 2976 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 483 words

Brijesh Sethi, J

1.

Vide this order, I shall dispose of a bail application filed under section 439 Cr.P.C on behalf of the petitioner Deepak Kumar in FIR No. 334/2019

u/s. 328/376D/384/34/506 IPC, PS Nangloi.

2.

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has prayed for bail on the ground that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated. Petitioner is in custody

since 09.07.2019. It is submitted that complainant has made false averments of being sexually assaulted while she was working with the petitioner. It

is further submitted that prosecutrix had performed marriage with the petitioner on 12.12.2018. It is further submitted that petitioner does not have any

criminal antecedents and his custodial interrogation is not required by the police. It is, therefore, therefore, prayed that petitioner be released on bail.

3.

Ld. APP for the State has opposed the bail petition on the ground that the allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature. It is further

submitted that on the pretext of showing her nude video, not only petitioner but some other persons had also raped the victim many times and also

extorted money from her. Ld. APP, has therefore, prayed for dismissal of bail application.

4.

I have considered the rival submissions. As per prosecution version, prosecutrix made a compliant on 09.07.2019 alleging that in July 2015, at about

4 p.m. petitioner Deepak forcibly raped her in a godown and made video of the incident. It is further alleged that during winter in 2015, petitioner along

with one boy again raped her in a hotel and also made video of the incident. Petitioner also extorted money and snatched credit and debit card of the

prosecutrix. On 01.03.2018, she got aborted and thereafter Deepak forcibly married her. On 17.01.2019, accused Deepak and his sister-in-law Deepa

called her in their house and locked her in a room where one Naveen raped her. On the basis of compliant made by the prosecutrix, a case under

Section 328/376D/384/506/34 IPC was registered. During the course of investigation, petitioner was arrested on 10.07.2019 and credit and debit card

of victim was got recovered from him. Accused Deepa was also arrested on 18.07.2019. Statement of prosecutrix under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was

also got recorded wherein she has supported her initial statement.

5.

The above allegations appearing against the petitioner are serious in nature. Petitioner has threatened the victim of uploading her nude video and

raped her several times. He has also extorted money by threatening the victim. The petitioner and her sister-in-law Deepa had also called the

prosecutrix in their house on 17.01.2019 where she was locked in a room and co-accused Naveen also raped her. Credit and debit card of victim have

been recovered from the petitioner. Keeping in mind the nature and gravity of offence, no grounds for bail are made out at this stage. The bail

application is, therefore, dismissed and stands disposed of accordingly.