AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 397 wordsHeard the parties through video conferencing. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects as
pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over.
In view of the personal undertaking of the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are
ignored for the present.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Dhansar P.S. Case No.134 of 2019 registered under sections
406/420/467/468/471/379/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has cheated the
informant and others of Rs.88,00,000/-. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and drawing attention of this Court
to page no.129 of the brief, it is submitted that the petitioner first instituted a complaint vide complaint case no.3359 of 2019 which upon being
forwarded to police under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., Dhanbad P.S. Case No.359 of 2019 was registered and as a counter blast the complainant after
fabricating a document purporting to be a bond executed by the petitioner, a copy of which has been kept at page no.47 of the brief, has foisted this
false case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has categorically stated that his signature is not appearing in the said page no.47 and that the same is
a forged document. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.08.2020 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 14 of the bail
application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be
admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above named petitioner on bail. Accordingly,
the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Dhanbad, in connection with Dhansar P.S. Case No.134 of 2019 with the condition that the
petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case.
