High CourtsSingle Bench

Deepak Shrivas vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 6 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 MP CK 0029

HON’BLE JUDGES
Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 306 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.64589 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 442 words

Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J

This is first bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C filed by the applicant for grant of bail.

The applicant was arrested on 03.12.2021 in connection with Crime No.636/2021 by Police Station Maharajpura, District Gwalior (MP) for the

offence punishable under Sections 306/34 of IPC.

As per prosecution story, on 01.05.2021 at 9:45 pm brother of the deceased Ravindra Singh gave an information at Police Station Maharajpura,

District Gwalior stating that his brother Satendra Singh aged 22 years was admitted in Military Hospital, Morar, as he was ill. On his information, Merg

No.35/2021 was registered and Merg was enquired. Postmortem was conducted and as per postmortem report, he died due to consumption of

aluminum phosphide poisoning and sudden cardiac arrest. On 12.05.2021 brother of the deceased Ravindra Singh stated that the applicant took loan

from his brother which he was not returning, due to which he committed suicide. This fact has been narrated in the said suicide note. Thereafter on

19.09.2021, 01.10.2021 and 10.10.2021, this fact was also stated by Krishna and Keerat Singh Tomar. On 02.05.2021 from the place of incident one

register containing suicide note was seized. After five months of the incident, on 03.10.2021 offence under Section 306/34 of IPC was registered

against the present applicant and one another accused Pawan Bhadouria. The applicant was arrested on 03.12.2021. His memorandum was recorded

but there is no recovery at the behest of the applicant. There is no signature in the copy of suicide note.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He is in jail since 03.12.2021. The

applicant is ready to abide by all the terms and conditions as may be imposed by this Court. Under these circumstances, he prays for grant of bail to

the applicant.

Learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the application and prays for its rejection.

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties at length and perused the case diary.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the application

should be allowed and by allowing the application it is ordered that if the applicant furnishes bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand

only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, he should be released on bail. He will present during trial before

the trial Court on each and every date.

Application stands allowed and disposed of.

Copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance.

Certified copy as per rules.