AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
39 paragraphs · 395 wordsHeard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the
petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R.
No.339/2016, Police Station Nathdwara, District Rajsamand for
the offences under Sections 498A & 406 IPC and Section 4 of the
D.P. Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
is ready to make payment of interim maintenance to the tune of
Rs.5,000/- per month to his wife Smt.Monika Sharma but urges
that having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances
available on record, the petitioner should be enlarged on
anticipatory bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances available on
record and having regard to the fair offer of interim maintenance
made on behalf of the petitioner, upon a consideration of the
arguments advanced at the Bar, this Court is of the opinion that it
is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under
Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed
that in the event of arrest of petitioner Deepak in connection with
F.I.R. No.339/2016, Police Station Nathdwara, District Rajsamand,
the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes an
undertaking in the trial Court that he shall make payment of
interim maintenance to the tune of Rs.5,000/- to his wife
Smt.Monika Sharma the complainant by the 10 th day of each
month herein after and provided he furnishes a personal bond in
the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/-
each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating
Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-
(i). that the petitioner(s) shall make himself/herself/themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii). that the petitioner(s) shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and
(iii). that the petitioner(s) shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
In case, the petitioner fails to make payment of interim
maintenance to the complainant in the above terms, the order of
anticipatory bail granted to him shall stand automatically
cancelled.
Copy of this order be forwarded to the complainant
forthwith.
