High CourtsDIVISION BENCH(2017) 05 RAJ CK 0031

Deepak Trivedi S/o Shyam Lal Trivedi vs Neha W/o Deepak Trivedi D/o Narendra Bohra

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 5 May 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Govind Mathur, Vinit Kumar Mathur
CASE NUMBER
1068 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

49 paragraphs · 469 words
1.

This appeal is before us to challenge the order dated

16.03.2017 passed by learned Family Court No.2, Jodhpur

rejecting an application to treat an application preferred under

Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, ''the Act of

1955'') as an application under Section 13-B of the Act of 1955

and further to grant a decree of divorce.

2.

In brief, factual matrix of the case is that the appellant

entered into a wedlock with respondent on 10.12.2013 at Jodhpur.

An application as per the provisions of Section 13 of the Act of

1955 was preferred by the appellant before the Family Court,

Chittorgarh on 11.12.2014 alleging cruelty and desertion on part (2 of 4) [CMA-1068/2017]

of the respondent. The application preferred before the Family

Court, Chittorgarh was transferred to Family Court No.2, Jodhpur

at the instance of the respondent.

3.

During pendency of the application aforesaid, the

appellant and the respondent arrived at a compromise to settle

their disputes and also decided to have a decree of divorce by a

mutual compromise. An application, thus, was preferred before

the Family Court No.2, Jodhpur to treat the application under

Section 13 of the Act of 1955 as an application under Section 13-B

of the Act of 1955 and further to annul the marriage by granting a

decree of divorce.

4.

Learned Family Court under the order impugned dated

16.03.2017 dismissed the application on the count that the

compromise produced was relating to resolution of certain

disputes, but not to have a decree of divorce as a consequence to

the compromise. Aggrieved by the same, the instant appeal is

preferred.

5.

So far as the order passed by the Family Court dated

16.03.2017 is concerned, we are of the view that the Family Court

rightly rejected the application as the compromise produced was

not having any recital to have a decree of divorce as a

consequence to mutual compromise.

6.

Be that as it may, before this court, the parties are

personally present and stated that they have arrived at a

compromise to resolve all disputes and also to have a decree of

divorce. They have also placed on record a compromise arrived

between them, contents of which read as follows :-

"VERNACULAR MATTER OMITTED"

7.

Looking to the fact that the application under Section

13 was filed much back on 11.12.2014 and thereafter parties

arrived at a compromise, which was placed before the Family

Court No.2, Jodhpur and further a compromise is placed before

this court, we deem it appropriate to accept this appeal in terms

of the compromise quoted above. Accordingly, the appeal is

allowed. The marriage solemnized between the parties on

10.12.2013 at Jodhpur is hereby annulled. A decree of divorce be

prepared and granted in terms of the compromise arrived between

the parties.