High CourtsSingle Bench

Deepak Tyagi vs State Nct Of Delhi

Delhi High Court · Decided on 14 May 2025 · Citation: (2025) 05 DEL CK 0875

HON’BLE JUDGES
Girish Kathpalia, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code , 1860 — Section 34, 109, 120B, 182, 211, 212, 392, 395, 397, 412
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application N0. 1840 Of 2025 & Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 14907 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 281 words

Girish Kathpalia, J

1.

The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 585/2023 of PS Daryaganj for offences under Section 392/395/397/412/120B/182/ 211/212/109/34 IPC. The earlier bail application of the accused/applicant was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court. Accordingly, the accused/applicant filed fresh bail application before the learned Trial Court which was dismissed vide order dated 09.05.2025. Hence, the present application.

2.

Learned APP accepts notice and assisted by the Investigating Officer/SI Mahaveer, fairly concedes that the accused/applicant deserves parity with the co-accused Asif Khan, who was granted regular bail by this court vide detailed order dated 27.03.2025.

3.

Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that he conspired in commission of dacoity involving an amount of Rs. 90,00,000/-. The accused/applicant was not personally involved in the actual act of dacoity. However, out of the allegedly looted money, a sum of Rs. 19,66,000/- was allegedly recovered from his house. Unlike co-accused Asif Khan, the accused/applicant was not even an employee of the victim Mayank Jain.

4.

Further, as discussed at length in bail order dated 27.03.2025 pertaining to co-accused Asif Khan, the manner of arrests of the accused persons prima facie does not inspire confidence.

5.

It is under these circumstances that learned APP has fairly opted not to oppose this bail application.

6.

The bail application is allowed and the accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.

7.

Copy of this order be sent to Jail Superintendent for informing the accused/applicant. Pending application stands disposed of.