Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Den Network Ltd vs M/s Mq Networks Private Limited

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 30 November 2021 · Citation: (2021) 11 TDSAT CK 0075

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shiva Kirti Singh, Chairperson · Subodh Kumar Gupta, Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
E .A 4 Of 2017 Broadcasting Petition No. 369 Of 2010 With Misc Application 1 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 192 words

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner / decree holder and learned counsel for respondents / judgment debtor.

Learned counsel for the decree holder submits that annexures in the affidavit of judgment debtor filed on 22.9.2021 are not legible or correctly photocopied so as to show the full contents and therefore, petitioner / decree holder could not file its response to the said affidavit although time was granted for that purpose on 11.10.2021.

A perusal of the annexures to said affidavit show that starting from page 30 onwards, several pages are either partially photocopied or are illegible. Learned counsel for the respondent shall ensure that complete and legible copies of the concerned annexures from page 30 onwards is supplied to the learned counsel for decree holder within two weeks.

Within the same time, four sets of relevant pages of the annexures should be filed with the Registry of this Tribunal for perusal at the time of next hearing.

Decree holder/petitioner may file its response within a further period of two weeks. Rejoinder, if required, to such response may be filed before the next date.

Post the matter under the same head on 11.1.2022.