High CourtsSingle Bench

Dera Baba Dargah Singh Through Manager And Mahant And Another vs Ravindra Kumar And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 1 April 2026 · Citation: (2026) 04 UK CK 0379

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Section 151 · Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 7 Rule 11, Order 9 Rule 13 · Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 227
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 765 Of 2026 (M/S)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 461 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners – plaintiffs under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:-

“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction, directing the Learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Haridwar to decide the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC expeditiously within a fixed time frame, and till then direct the parties to maintain status quo over the property in question and also not to create any third party interest over the property in question, during pendency of the Original Suit No.123 of 2016, "Dera Baba Dargah Singh & Another vs. Ravindra Kumar & Others" before the Learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Haridwar.

(ii) Pass any other or further order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.

(iii) Award the cost of petition to the Petitioner.”

2.

Heard Mr. Narendra Bali, learned counsel for the petitioners.

3.

Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate, has contended that the Original Suit (O.S. No.123 of 2016, “Dera Baba Dargah Singh through Manager & Mehant and Another vs. Ravindra Kumar and Others”) was decreed ex-parte on 03.04.2018. An Execution Application was filed. The respondents - defendants filed an application under Order IX Rule 13 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 along with delay condonation application. The Application, filed under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, was allowed on 20.05.2019. The respondents did not file their written statements. The trial court granted them last opportunity to file written statements. The respondents failed to file their written statements. Then, the learned trial court proceeded ex- parte against them. On the application of the respondents- defendants, the ex-parte order was recalled on 18.04.2022. The respondents–defendants filed their written statements on 17.05.2022. Issues and additional issues were framed. The respondents filed an Application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on 20.03.2023, which is still pending.

4.

Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate, on instructions, received from the petitioner, has requested to decide the present writ petition with a direction to the learned trial court to decide the Application, filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, within four weeks.

5.

Having heard, in the facts and circumstances of this case, the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Haridwar is directed to decide the Application, filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Original Suit No.123 of 2016, as expeditiously as possible, as per law, but not later than four weeks’ from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

6.

The present Writ Petition No.765 of 2026 (M/S) is disposed of accordingly.

7.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case.