High CourtsSingle Bench

Desalegn Atnafu Abebe vs Narcotics Control Bureau

Delhi High Court · Decided on 1 April 2026 · Citation: (2026) 04 DEL CK 0082

HON’BLE JUDGES
Girish Kathpalia, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 8, 21, 23, 29
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 4445 Of 2025 & Criminal Miscellaneous Application (Bail) No. 2315 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 611 words

Girish Kathpalia, J

1.

The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case Crime No. VIII/74/DZU/2022 of Police Station NCB DZU, RK Puram for offence under Section 8/21/23/29 NDPS Act.

1.1 This bail application came up for the first hearing on 20.11.2025 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench.

1.2 Today is the first hearing before me.

2.

I have heard learned counsel  for accused/applicant as well as learned prosecutor on behalf of NCB. Learned counsel for accused/applicant claims parity on the ground that co-accused Yesak Angsom was granted bail in similar circumstances in Bail Application No. 1100/2025, decided by this court on 28.07.2025. Learned counsel for NCB submits that the present case stands on different footing, so parity is not applicable here.

3.

Broadly  speaking, the case  set  up  by  prosecution is that  they  seized 4.98  kg  cocaine  from  co-accused Dipali  during  a raid  in  Tilak  Nagar,  New Delhi and in her confessional statement, Dipali stated having received the contraband from one Dawit and one Desalegn (the present accused/applicant) at hotel Apex Regency, Mumbai on instructions of her husband Peter. On being summoned, Dawit and the accused/applicant disclosed before NCB that they were sent to India from Ethiopia by one Aklilu, who had provided them trolly bags containing cocaine. The accused/applicant allegedly disclosed that the co-accused Yesak, also staying in hotel Apex Regency had come to India on 13.10.2022 and one Ethiopian  national  lady was  expected to come  to  India  on 14.10.2022  from Ethiopia  in  the  same  hotel  and  that  they  were  involved  in  drug  trafficking. On the basis of the said information, NCB carried out a search at hotel Apex Regency  on 14.10.2022 during which the co-accused Yesak disclosed  that one Ethiopian lady named Kelemuwa was staying in hotel Sukoon and was carrying contraband. On the basis of raid carried out in hotel Sukoon, 2.055kg cocaine was recovered from trolly bag of Kelemuwa.

4.

As mentioned above, co-accused Yesak  was granted bail vide order dated 28.07.2025, copy whereof is Annexure P-9 to the present bail application.  That  order  was  passed  after  examination  of  the  CCTV  footage of the hotel corridor, played in court.

5.

Learned counsel for NCB submits that the difference in the present case is that the alleged drug money USD 3500 was recovered from the present accused/applicant and there are WhatsApp chats between the present accused/applicant and Aklilu. No other difference has been pointed out.

6.

In the case of the co-accused Yesak also, money was recovered from the  said  accused,  though  the  amount  was  lesser.  So  far  as  WhatsApp  chats are concerned, no explicitly incriminating WhatsApp chat has been shown to this court.

7.

In other words, apart from disclosure statement, there is no other evidence against the present accused/applicant.

8.

It is informed by both sides that visa of the accused/applicant has already expired.

9.

Under these circumstances, the application is allowed and the accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the  Trial Court. It is specifically directed that upon acceptance of bail bond, custody of the accused/applicant shall be handed over  by the  concerned  Jail  Superintendent  to  the  FRRO.  A copy of this  order  be  immediately  transmitted  to  the  concerned  Jail  Superintendent for informing the accused/applicant. Pending application also stands disposed of.

10.

It is made clear that nothing observed in this order shall be read to the prejudice of either side at the final stage of the trial.