High CourtsSingle Bench

Desraj Singh vs Emperor

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 5 August 1919 · Citation: AIR 1919 All 174 : 52 Ind. Cas. 672

HON’BLE JUDGES
Wallach, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (CrPC) — Section 110, 437
RESULT
Dismissed
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 178 words

Wallach, J.—The applicant, Desraj, had been discharged by a Magistrate of the First Class in an enquiry u/s 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The District Magistrate of Mainpuri ordered a further enquiry u/s 437. Against that order Desraj has applied in revision to this Court. In Khargav. Emperor 22 Ind. Cas. 183 : 12 A.L.J. 167 : 15 Cri. L.J. 39 : 36 A.147PC a Divisional Bench of this Court has held that a District Magistrate has jurisdiction to direct further enquiry in a case where a person has been discharged in an enquiry u/s 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. I am bound by that ruling and, therefore, have to hold that the District Magistrate had jurisdiction to pass the order which is attacked in this revision. The only question that remains is whether he was justified, in the exercise of his jurisdiction, in ordering a further enquiry. I am not prepared to tie the Magistrate''s hands, and to hold that be was not justified in passing the order and, therefore, reject this application.