High CourtsSingle Bench

Devendra Nath Trivedi vs Shruti Pandya Trivedi And Another

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 26 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 MP CK 0164

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.A.Dharmadhikar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 125(3), 397, 401
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision No. 733 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 241 words

S.A.Dharmadhikari, J

1.

Heard finally with the consent of both the parties.

2.

This revision petition, under section 397 read with 401 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed assailing the orders dated 12/12/2019 and 13/12/2019 passed in

Case No. 516/2019 pending before Principal Judge, Family Court, Gwalior, whereby recovery/arrest warrant has been issued against the petitioner on

an application under section 125(3) of the Cr.P.C.

3.

Vide order dated 12/7/2021 passed in F.A. No.233/2014, a settlement has been arrived at between the parties, in pursuance whereof

petitioner/father of proforma respondent-husband has deposited five bank drafts each of Rs.8,00,000/-(Rupees eight lacs only) in total Rs.40,00,000/-

(Rupees forty lacs only) with the Registry of this Court vide note-sheet dated 29/6/2021. The said amount is to be released to the respondent/wife only

after all the litigations presently pending between the parties either in the Family Court or before this Court are withdrawn or decided finally and proof

in this regard is filed before the Registry of this Court.

4.

In view of the aforesaid, respondent has no objection if the impugned orders are quashed.

5.

Accordingly, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties vide order dated 12/7/2021 (Supra) passed in F.A. No.233/2014, the impugned

orders dated 12/12/2019 and 13/12/2019 (Annexure P/1) whereby recovery/arrest warrant has been issued against the petitioner are set aside and the

recovery/arrest warrant is hereby recalled.

6.

The petition, accordingly, stands allowed to the extent indicated above.