High CourtsSingle Bench

Devraj vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 15 March 2024 · Citation: (2024) 03 UK CK 0055

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Uttar Pradesh Gangster And Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 — Section 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xi), 3
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 441 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 169 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Devraj is in judicial custody in Case Crime No.575 of 2022, under Sections 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xi)/3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Ranipur, District- Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that in all the cases, based on which the instant FIR has been lodged, the applicant has already been released on bail; the main accused, in the instant case, has been enlarged on bail.

4.

These facts are admitted by learned State Counsel.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.