AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
M. R. Mengdey, J
The applicant has filed this Application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11185004231693 of 2023 registered with Jamkhambhaliya Police Station, Devbhumi Dwarka for the offences punishable under Sections 3, 4 (1), 4 (2), 4 (3) of the Land Grabbing Act.
Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent – State.
Learned Advocate for the applicant / accused has submitted that the present applicant has filed the affidavit indicating that the land in question bearing revenue survey no.81 (old survey no.109) is no longer in his possession and he has now vacated the said land.
3.1 Learned Advocate for the applicant has further submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present application for grant of regular bail. Looking to the nature of offence, she has submitted that this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant. Learned APP further submitted that if the Hon'ble Court is inclined to grant bail then in such case strict conditions may be imposed to secure the presence of the applicant accused.
This court has considered the following aspects:
(a) Applicant has vacated the land in question.
(b) On the last ocassion, the APP was asked to verify as to whether the present applicant has vacated the land in question or not. Today, on instruction, learned APP states that the present applicant has vacated the said land in question.
(c) That the Applicant is in custody since 16.12.2023.
(d) The law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. C.B.I. Reported in (2012) 1 SCC 40.
Having heard the learned Advocates for the parties and perusing the record produced in this case as well as taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature of allegations, gravity of accusation, availability of the Applicant Accused at the time of Trial etc. and the role attributed to the present Applicant accused, the present Application deserves to be allowed and accordingly stands allowed. This Court has also gone through the FIR and police papers and also the earlier order passed by the learned Sessions Court where the learned Sessions Judge has disallowed the bail Application at initial stage. The Applicant Accused is ordered to be released on bail in connection with the aforesaid FIR on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, subject to the following conditions that he shall:
(a) not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.
(b) maintain law and order and not to indulge in any criminal activities.
(c) furnish the documentary proof of complete, correct and present address of residence to the Investigating Officer and to the Trial Court at the time of executing the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the trial Court.
(d) provide contact numbers as well as the contact numbers of the sureties before the Trial Court. In case of change in such numbers inform in writing immediately to the trial Court.
(e) file an affidavit stating his immovable properties whether self acquired or ancestral with description, location and present value of such properties before the Trial Court, if any.
(f) not leave India without prior permission of the Trial Court.
(g) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week. If the Applicant does not possess passport, shall file an Affidavit to that effect.
Bail bond to be executed before the Trial Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It would be open for the Trial Court concerned to give time to furnish the solvency certificate if prayed for.
If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Trial Court concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action according to law. The Authorities will release the Applicant forthwith only if the Applicant is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being.
At the trial, the concerned trial Court shall not be influenced by the prima facie observations made by this Court in the present order.
Rule is made absolute. Direct service permitted.