AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 103 wordsTarlok Singh Chauhan, J
Admittedly, the transfer of the petitioner has been effected on the basis of a D.O. note and there is no application of any independent mind by the administrative department.
This question has already been considered and decided by this Court in CWP No. 801 of 2013 titled as Sanjay Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & others alongwith connected matters, decided on 5.7.2013.
Consequently, we find merit in this writ petition. Accordingly, the same is allowed and impugned office order dated 23.6.2020 (Annexure P-5) is quashed and set-aside.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
