High CourtsSingle Bench

Dhananjay Kumar Singh vs State Of Bihar And Others

Patna High Court · Decided on 11 June 2020 · Citation: (2020) 06 PAT CK 0092

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vikash Jain, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6169 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 839 words

Vikash Jain, J

1.

This matter has been taken up for hearing through video conference. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that all defects pointed out by the stamp reporter shall be removed, and compliance with the conditions of the notices of this Court with regard to acceptance of e-filing shall be made, without delay immediately after the lockdown ends, and in any event within one month thereof. Learned counsel for the respondents states that he has no objection in this regard and the matter be taken up on merits in view of the stated urgency.

2.

The following reliefs as formulated by the petitioner have been claimed in the writ petition --

"i) To direct the respondent authorities to stop demolition of property/building/house of the petitioner in Thana No. 124, Khata No. 244 and Khesra No. 1069 situated at Mauza Sonagopalpur, Village and P.O. Gopalpur, Anchal Sampatchak, District Patna;

ii) To direct the respondent authorities to produce all the documents related to land acquisition proceedings or encroachment proceedings, if any, done against the land/property/building of the petitioner;

iii) To direct the respondent authorities to abstain from any demolition work in relation to the property of the petitioner during the pendency of this case;

iv) To direct the respondent authorities to not initiate any encroachment proceedings or land acquisition proceedings during the subsistence of deadly pandemic created by Covid-19 virus;

v) To direct the respondent authorities to maintain peace and harmony amongst the citizens residing at Sampatchak, Patna and ensure that no citizen is rendered homeless and vulnerable to the infection of Covid-19 virus which could be created by demolition of their houses;

vi) To take appropriate actions against the erring respondents for committing misdeeds, misdemeanor and illegality, particularly for keeping the petitioner in mental distress and harassment;

vii) To direct for payment of compensation to the petitioner if it is found that the land/property/building has been demolished without proper acquisition or encroachment proceedings;

viii) To any other relief/s to which the petitioner is found entitled to."

3.

At the outset, learned SC-25 Mr. Sajid Salim Khan appearing on behalf of the respondents states on instruction that the house of the petitioner has not been touched and demolition proceedings are being conducted in respect of other properties in the area. No notice has yet been issued to the petitioner with respect to the demolition of his house and as such the present writ petition is premature. Moreover, as stated in para 11 of the writ petition itself, the petitioner had filed writ petition in CWJC No. 25523 of 2019 when the house and property of the petitioner was marked in the month of June, 2019, in which the State was directed to file counter affidavit and which is still pending.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of demolition work having been started in the locality, there is real apprehension that the petitioner's house and property which had already been marked earlier may also be demolished.

5.

Heard the parties. It is not in dispute that no notice has been received by the petitioner in connection with demolition of his house and property. It is also not in dispute that the legality of the markings made has been questioned in CWJC No. 25523 of 2019 which is pending and in which a counter affidavit from the State has been called for. It has further been stated in para 13 of the writ petition that the petitioner and other raiyats of the area have filed representations in June, 2019 before the respondent authorities, which are also said to be pending.

6.

In the above view of the matter, this Court is of the view that it will suffice if the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna (Respondent No. 5) is directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, if still pending, in accordance with law, after grant of an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of two weeks from today.

7.

It is made clear that in view of the ongoing lockdown and Covid-19 pandemic, any correspondence between the parties may be made through email and that the concerned authority shall be at liberty to hear the petitioner through video conference. To enable the same, the petitioner undertakes to furnish his mobile number and e-mail ID to learned S.C. 25 not later than by Saturday, i.e. 13.06.2020, for its onward transmission to the concerned authority.

8.

The petitioner is always at liberty to file an Interlocutory Application for appropriate relief in the pending CWJC No. 25523 of 2019, if so advised.

9.

In the meantime and until disposal of the representation as aforesaid, the interim order dated 09.06.2020 passed by this Court shall continue.

10.

The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions.

11.

Office shall ensure that all defects have been removed and compliance with the notices of this Court has been made, within the stipulated time as provided in para 1 hereinabove.