High CourtsSingle Bench

Dhani @ Dhaneswar Barik vs State Of Orissa

Orissa High Court · Decided on 20 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 OHC CK 0129

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sashikanta Mishra, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 354B, 427, 452 · Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 12
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 10351 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 357 words

Sashikanta Mishra, J

1.

This matter is taken up through virtual mode.

2.

Heard Mr. Pradipta Beura, learned counsel for the Petitioner, and Mr. A. Pradhan, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.

3.

The Petitioner is in custody since 11th November, 2021 in connection with Khuntuni P.S. Case No.46/2018 corresponding to Special G.R. Case

No.36/2018 pending in the court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-Special Court under POCSO Act, Cuttack for the alleged commission of the

offence under Sections 452/354-B/427 of I.P.C. read with Section 12 of the POCSO Act.

4.

The Petitioner was earlier granted bail by the learned court below and because of his non-appearance, NBW was issued on the strength of which

he was arrested and taken into custody on 11th November, 2021.

5.

It is submitted that because of communication gap between the Petitioner and his counsel as also the fact that because of an accident he had

sustained several bodily injuries, he could not properly instruct his counsel to take steps in the case on the date fixed.

6.

Having regard to the submissions as above, the fact that the Petitioner was already released on bail by the learned court below as also the fact that

the Petitioner was unable to appear on the date fixed because of bonafide difficulties, I am inclined to allow the prayer for bail.

7.

Let the Petitioner be released on bail on such terms and conditions as may be imposed by the court in seisin over the matter in the aforesaid case

including the condition that he shall appear before the trial court on each date of posting of the case without fail.

8.

The BLAPL is disposed of.

9.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order

available in the High court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned Advocate, in the manner prescribed vide

Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020, modified by Notice No.4798, dated 15th April, 2021 and Court’s Office Order circulated

vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.

...............................................