High CourtsSingle Bench

Dharampal vs State, Through Pp

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 6 March 2020 · Citation: (2020) 03 RAJ CK 0069

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vijay Bishnoi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 8, 15, 25 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 681 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 473 words

Vijay Bishnoi, J

1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2.

The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No. 136/2018 of Police Station Taranagar, District Churu for the offences punishable under Section 8/15

and 25 of NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it is clear from the statement of Sunil Kumar (PW-1), the then SHO of Police Station,

Taranagar, District Churu that nine plastic bags containing poppy husk were recovered by the police and the Seizure Officer first took 500 gms. of

poppy husk from each bag, then he mixed the same and thereafter took two sampels from that mixture. Thus, it is clear that the Seizure Officer did

not collect separate samples from each bag. It is also submitted that the I.O. has not stated that the test by the U.N. Kit was carried out on each bag

before taking small quantity of poppy husk for samples.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance on the decision of this Court rendered in the case of Netram v. State of Rajasthan,

reported in 2014(1) Cr.L.R. (Raj.) 163 has argued that this Court has held that if the samples from each bag containing poppy husk/poppy straw have

not been collected and test by U.N. Kit has not been conducted on each bag and if the Seizure Officer has taken out some quantity of narcotic drug

from each bag and after mixing the same has taken out some portion for sample, then, the same is not in conformity with the Standing Instruction No.

1/88 issued by the Narcotics Control Bureau, New Delhi, particularly, Instruction No. 1.7 and, as such, it cannot be said that the narcotic contraband

recovered in the matter is of commercial quantity or above. It is, thus, prayed that the petitioners may kindly be enlarged on bail.

5.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

6.

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and

proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

7.

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Dharampal S/o Balbeer shall be released

on bail in connection with FIR No. 136/2018 of Police Station Taranagar, District Churu provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of

Rs. 50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on

each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.