High CourtsDivision Bench

Dharamvir Kumar vs State Of Bihar And Ors

Patna High Court · Decided on 18 September 2020 · Citation: (2020) 09 PAT CK 0230

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Karol, CJ · S. Kumar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bihar Prohibition And Excise Act, 2016 — Section 30, 30(a), 56
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7229 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

35 paragraphs · 648 words

The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video

Conferencing from their residence.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

i. “For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ for commanding the respondents to release the Hero Passion Pro

Motorcycle of the petitioner bearing Registration No. BR-01CU8416, Chassis No. MBLHA10BSGHB32276, Engine No. HA10EVGHB35722 during

pendency of the confiscation proceeding as the same has been seized in connection with Derni P.S. Case No. 214 of 2019 dated 24.11.2019

registered under Sections 30 & 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 with tempered registration BR04AA-8641.

ii. For issuance of any other appropriate writ, order or direction which your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the

case.â€​

Informant is a police officers who has alleged in his written complaint that on 23.11.2019 while he was on night patrolling duty alongwith other police

personnel, he received a confidential information that in the house of Pankaj Kumar illicit liquor has been stored and are being sold and as he reached

said place, he saw two cartoons were tied on a motorcycle parked outside his house and on search of said cartoons illicit foreign liquor were

recovered and thereafter said motorcycle and illicit liquor were seized for which FIR was instituted giving rise to Derni P.S. Case No. 214 of 2019

registered under Sections 30 & 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016.

It is submitted on behalf of counsel for the petitioner that he is owner of the motorcycle which was stolen on 24.07.2019 by thieves, for which he had

instituted FIR giving rise to Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 721 of 2019 and unknown miscreants were using his stolen motorcycle on a fake registration

number and same has been seized by the police in Derni P.S. Case No. 214 of 2019 dated 24.11.2019.

As there has been recovery of illicit liquor from the motorcycle, same is liable for confiscation under Section 56 of the Excise Act, however, since the

seized motorcycle was stolen by unknown miscreants for which petitioner had already instituted FIR, as such, petitioner cannot be held responsible for

indulging in trade of illicit liquor by using his stolen motorcycle.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the District Magistrate, Chapra/Confiscating officer, Chapra is directed to provisionally release the vehicle

of petitioner after due identification of ownership of the vehicle which was stolen and subsequently recovered and seized by the police in excise case

on production of ownership and registration with respect to vehicle in question in his name with two sureties (one local) to the extent of the value of

the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document.

The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/undertakings:

(i) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation

proceeding and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.

(ii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required.

(iii) Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama would be prepared wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the

petitioner and same shall be kept on record so that in future if so required, it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an

undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama.

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above, which would

however be subject to finalization of the confiscation proceeding.

With said observations, this writ petition is disposed of.