AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
7 paragraphs · 232 wordsYogendra Kumar Purohit, J
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.11/2023, Police Station Baitu, District Barmer for the offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380/34 of the IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are triable by Magistrate. The petitioner is in the judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.
Learned AAG has opposed the bail application.
I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.
Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Dharma Ram S/o Goga Ram, shall be enlarged on bail in FIR No.11/2023, Police Station Baitu, District Barmer provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.