High CourtsSingle Bench

Dharmaseelan vs State Of Tamil Nadu

Madras High Court · Decided on 27 February 2026 · Citation: (2026) 02 MAD CK 1811

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.Srimathy, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 75(1)(iv), 115(2), 126(2), 191(2), 269, 296(b), 351(2)
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition (MD) No. 3501 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 414 words

S.Srimathy, J

1.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 31.01.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 296(b), 126(2), 115(2), 351(2) & 75(1) (iv) of BNS Act, in Crime No.32 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons had harassed the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court and he is in judicial custody from 31.01.2026. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

4.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that there are no previous cases pending against the petitioner and the investigation is still pending.. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5.

Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

6.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kulithalai, and on further conditions that :-

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall stay at Trichy and report before the Inspector of Police, Cantonment Police Station, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.