High CourtsSingle Bench

Dharmendra Kumar vs The State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 8 May 2015 · Citation: (2015) 4 PLJR 668

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 239, 482 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 420, 467, 468, 471
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc. No. 19907 of 2015
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 253 words

Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.—The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ''the Code'') has been filed for quashing the order dated 6.1.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Aurangabad in Tr. No. 1777 of 2014 arising out of Aurangabad (Town) P.S. Case No. 450 of 2011, whereby he has rejected the application of the petitioner filed under Section 239 of the Code for discharge. The petitioner has been made accused in Aurangabad (Town) P.S. Case No. 450 of 2011 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

2.

According to the prosecution case, the petitioner was appointed on the post of Fishery Supervisor on the basis of documents submitted by him, which were forged and fabricated. The First Information Report was instituted on the basis of information given by the District Fishery Officer. The allegations made in the First Information Report were found to be true in course of investigation and on completion of investigation the police submitted charge-sheet, pursuant to which cognizance was taken for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. At the stage of framing of charge, an application under Section 239 of the Code was filed by the petitioner, which has been dismissed by the court below vide order dated 6.1.2015. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, I find no illegality in the order impugned. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.