High CourtsSingle Bench

Dharmraj Bagdi vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 5 November 2019 · Citation: (2019) 11 MP CK 0038

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.A. Dharmadhikari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 380
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 33719 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 550 words

Learned counsel for the rival parties are heard.

The applicant has filed this First bail application under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.

The applicant has been arrested by Police Station G.R.P., District Guna (M.P.) in connection with Crime No. 28/2019 registered in relation to the offences punishable under section 380 of IPC.

Prosecution story in nut shell is that the complainant alongwith his wife were travelling in Kota-Jabalpur Express and during his train journey, his MI company make mobile phone, along with BSNL company make SIM and charger of the said mobile was stolen by some unknown person. On the basis of aforesaid, the applicant has been implicated in the present case.

The applicant is a youth of 25 years of age and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted by the counsel for applicant that charge sheet has since been filed and further custodial interrogation of the applicant may not be required. The offence alleged is triable by JMFC. The applicant is in jail since 19/07/2019 without any substantial reason and early conclusion of trial is bleak possibility and the applicant cannot be kept in custody for an unlimited period. Under these grounds, applicant prays for grant of bail.

Per contra, application is opposed by the counsel for the State and prayed for its rejection by contending that on the basis of the allegations and the material available on record, no case for grant of bail is made out.

However, it would not be desirable to enter into the merits of the rival contentions at this juncture. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the fact that trial is not likely to conclude in near future and prolonged pre-trial detention being an anathema to the concept of liberty, this Court is inclined to extend the benefit of bail to the applicant.

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case , this application is allowed though on stringent conditions and it is directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lac only) with two local solvent sureties each of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court/ committal court for his appearance on the dates given by the concerned court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-

1.

The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

2.

The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/ tria, as the case may be;

3.

The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4.

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;

5.

The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

6.

The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

A copy of this order be sent to the Court concerned for compliance.

C.C. as per rules.