AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
24 paragraphs · 464 wordsThis petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the F.I.R. dated 27.2.2018, registered as FIR No.0042 of 2018, under Section 498-A, 323,
504 of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Vasant Vihar, District Dehradun on the ground that the dispute has been
amicably settled between the parties and the offence has been compounded. Alongwith this writ petition, joint compounding application has also been
filed by the parties. In support of compounding application, affidavits have been filed by Mr. Dhiraj Khanna (petitioner) and Smt. Reeta Kumari
(respondent no.3). It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the parties have entered into the compromise and the respondent no.3
does not wants to prosecute her case filed against the petitioner. It is prayed that the offences punishable under Section 498-A, 323, 504 of IPC and
Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, arising out of F.I.R. dated 27.2.2018, registered as FIR No.0042 of 2018, registered at Police Station Vasant
Vihar, District Dehradun, may be compounded and the entire proceedings of the said F.I.R. may be quashed.Â
Petitioner and complainant (respondent no.3) are present in the Court today and they are duly identified by their respective counsel. Petitioner and
complainant (respondent no.3) categorically stated that the dispute has been settled between them and there is no grievance remained between each
other and they are ready to compound the offences. Respondent no.3 stated that after filing the petition under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act,
1955, the respondent no.3 does not wants to proceed the criminal proceeding arising out of the aforesaid FIR, because the grievance of the respondent
no.3 has been settled from the petitioner.
In view of the principle of law laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC
303 as well as in Transfer Petition (Criminal) No. 115 of 2012 (Dimpey Gujral vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh) decided on 06.12.2012, criminal
proceedings can be quashed by this Court, if this Court is satisfied that matter has been settled between the parties amicably and parties are interested
to restore peace and harmony between them.Â
Having considered submission of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the entire material available on record, I am satisfied that
the matter has been settled between the parties amicably. Therefore, the writ petition deserves to be allowed.Â
Compounding application is, accordingly, disposed of.Â
Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Impugned F.I.R. dated 27.2.2018, registered as FIR No.0042 of 2018, under Section 498-A, 323, 504 of
IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at Police Station Vasant Vihar District Dehradun, is hereby quashed, so far it relates to the
petitioner.
Â
