Supreme CourtFull Bench(2014) 05 SC CK 0025

Dhirender Sharma vs Emerald Court Owners

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 5 May 2014 · Citation: 2014 (9 ) SCALE 59

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.M. Lodha, J · Madan B. Lokur, J · Kurian Joseph, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
SLP (C)....../2014 CC 6754/2014 and SLP (C) No. 11959 of 2014, SLP(C) No..../2014 (CC 7546 of 2014) SLP (C) No. 12470 of 2014

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 182 words
1.

Permission to file special leave petitions is granted in S.L.P.(Civil) No.../2014 [CC No. 6754/2014] and S.L.P.(Civil) No.../2014 [CC No. 7546 of 2014]. Issue notice returnable on July 21, 2014.

2.

Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted.

3.

Ms. Bina Gupta, advocate, waives service for the Respondent - Emerald Court Owners Resident Welfare Association.

4.

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for the Respondent - New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA).

5.

Notice shall be issued only to the unrepresented Respondents. Having regard to the statement made by Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned senior counsel for the builder - Supertech Ltd., that in pursuance of the High Court's order, the subject Tower Nos. 16 and 17 have been sealed, it is directed that status quo in all respects, as existing today, in respect of these two towers (Tower Nos. 16 and 17) shall be maintained by all concerned. The builder and so also the flat purchasers shall henceforth not alienate, transfer or create any third party interest of any nature whatsoever in the subject property (Tower Nos. 16 and 17).