Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Digicable Com Comminication Services Pvt. Ltd vs Tulip Telecom Ltd.

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 18 October 2022 · Citation: (2022) 10 TDSAT CK 0034

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ram Krishna Gautam, Member
CASE NUMBER
Broadcasting Petition No. 506 Of 2015
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 148 words

Learned counsel for petitioner is present. None is for respondent. Listing is after a long gap of time.  Respondent company was said to be under liquidation. Some counsel for Official Liquidator was appearing but none is present today. Current status of the company is also not on record. Hence, a notice was issued to respondent / Official Liquidator and it has been received back with endorsement ‘delivery’.  Even after service to Official Liquidator, none is there to mention the present status.

Hence, now a notice is to be issued through police mode.

Let steps be taken by way of affidavit detailing police station etc. for making the service through concerned police station to respondent. It be filed by the petitioner within two weeks. Then after notice be issued through police mode to the respondent fixing date for further direction by office.

List the matter ‘for directions’ on 30.1.2023.