High CourtsSingle Bench

Digpal And Others vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 20 July 2021 · Citation: (2021) 07 UK CK 0133

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1341 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 354 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

This writ petition has been filed by seventeen persons, seeking the following relief:

“I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to provide opportunity of hearing to the

petitioner and not to demolish their houses and not to vacate them from the land/Khasra no. 406 Village Nakholiyana Pokhri PS Pokhri Tehsil Pokhri

District Chamoli.â€​

2.

It transpires that, pursuant to the direction issued by Division Bench of this Court in WPPIL No. 174 of 2018 “Manmohan Singh Vs. State of

Uttarakhand & othersâ€​, the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Pokhri, Chamoli, identified 74 encroachments over public land.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that name of the petitioners is not included in the list of encroachers prepared by Public Works

Department; yet, the respondents are threatening them to demolish their structures.

4.

Learned Additional C.S.C. was asked to get instructions in the matter. Today, learned Additional C.S.C., on instructions, submits that notices have

been issued to all the encroachers and since petitioners refused to accept notices, therefore, the notices were pasted on the main door of the structure

raised by the petitioners.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, submits that notices were sent to petitioners after filing of the writ petition. However, the fact of the

matter is that now notices have been sent to all the petitioners.

6.

Learned Additional C.S.C. submits that no demolition has taken place as of now.

7.

Having regard to the facts & circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to give reply to the notices issued

by the Competent Authority as early as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from today. The Competent Authority shall consider the

reply to be submitted by the petitioners and take appropriate decision by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of two

weeks thereafter.

8.

For a period of four weeks or till final decision is taken by the Competent Authority, whichever is earlier, status quo, as of today, shall be

maintained.