High CourtsSingle Bench

Dildar Ahmad And Ors vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 5 July 2019 · Citation: (2019) 07 CHH CK 0046

HON’BLE JUDGES
Goutam Bhaduri, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20(b)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 2711 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 264 words

Goutam Bhaduri, J

1.

This is the Second Bail Application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicants who have been arrested on 20.03.2017 in connection with Crime No.23/2017 registered at Police Station Farasgaon, Civil and Revenue District Kondagaon (CG) for the offence punishable under Section 20 (b) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

2.

The First Bail Application bearing M.Cr.C. No.7400 of 2018 was dismissed as withdrawn on 30.10.2018.

3.

As per the prosecution case, on an information received that on 20.03.2017 some of the persons were transporting cannabis, a car was intercepted and from the car 101.379 KG cannabis was recovered, wherein the applicants were also the occupants. Thereby the offence has been committed.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated and it was alleged that the cannabis was found from the joint possession. He would further submit that there is no evidence on record to prove the fact that the applicants were in conscious possession and the trial has not been concluded till date despite the order passed by this Court in M.Cr.C. No.7400 of 2018 on 30.10.2018, therefore, the applicants may be released on bail.

5.

Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail.

6.

Perused the case-diary documents. Taking into the fact the quantum of cannabis so seized, I do not find any enormous delay has caused in this case, considering the same I am not inclined to release the applicants on bail.

7.

Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed.