High CourtsSingle Bench

Dileep vs Mohanan

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 24 August 2023 · Citation: (2023) 08 KL CK 0266

HON’BLE JUDGES
A. Badharudeen, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 227
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Original Petition (CRL.) No. 549 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 411 words

A. Badharudeen, J

1.

This original petition (criminal) has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside Ext.P1 order viz. Order in C.M.P. No.504/2022 in M.C. No.139/2020 dated 01.06.2023.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Even though notice issued to the respondent, he did not appear.

3.

In this matter, as early on 09.09.2021 the Family Court ordered maintenance in favour of the respondent herein who is none other than the father of the petitioners herein to pay Rs.1,500/- each by the petitioners herein.

4.

Aggrieved by the ex-parte order, the petitioners filed C.M.P. No.504/2022 to set aside the ex-parte order along with C.M.P. No.502/2022 to condone delay of 344 days. The Family Court condoned the delay and allowed the petition to set aside ex-parte order imposing following conditions:

“1.  The  petition  is  allowed  on  condition  of payment of arrears of maintenance by the petitioners herein, who are the respondents in MC. No.139/2020, jointly at the rate of Rs.1,500/- per month to the petitioner in the MC. No.139/2020 towards his maintenance from 09.09.2020 till 31.05.2023.

2.

The original respondents/petitioners herein shall pay 50% of the arrears on or before 24.06.2023 and the remaining 50% of arrears shall be paid on or before 07.07.2023 to the petitioner in MC. No.139/2020, failing which, CMP. No.504/2022 shall stands dismissed.”

5.

Now the learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that only Rs.20,000/- deposited and the learned counsel is not even in a position to tell the date of deposit.

6.

Going by the impugned order, the Family Court set aside the ex-parte order with direction to the petitioners herein to effect deposit of 50% of the arrears on or before 24.06.2023 and the remaining 50% on or before 07.07.2023. Admittedly, the petitioners did not deposit the amount as directed by the Family Court.

7.

Therefore, this original petition stands allowed by extending time for payment of arrears as directed by the Family Court in Ext.P1 impugned order on or before 15.09.2023. On such payment, the impugned order viz. order in C.M.P. No.504/2022 in M.C. No.139/2020 dated 01.06.2023 challenged in this original petition stands set aside, with liberty to the petitioners/respondents in MC to adduce evidence.

If the amount is not deposited on or before 15.09.2023, the impugned order in C.M.P. No.504/2022 in M.C. No.139/2020 dated 01.06.2023 shall stand revived and the Family Court can enforce the order in C.M.P. No.504/2022 in M.C. No.139/2020 dated 01.06.2023, without fail.