High CourtsSingle Bench

Dimple vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 8 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 SHI CK 0123

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 699 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 339 words

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J

1.

Notice. Mr. R.R. Rahi, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2. No notice is

required to be issued to respondent No.3.

2.

Heard.

3.

The petitioner has been transferred to GMS Challing under complex GSSS Tingret, District Lahaul & Spiti vide order dated 4th February, 2021

(Annexure P-2). The transfer has purportedly been effected in compliance to the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP

No.4507 of 2020, decided on 15.10.2020. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is faced with some adverse medical situation,

due to which, it will be extremely difficult for her to serve in GMS Challing, District Lahaul & Spiti.

4.

It has been repeatedly held by this Court that transfer is an incidence of service and no one has an absolute right to stay at a particular place for

years together. The place, where an employee is to be posted and when he is to be posted is the prerogative of the employer, to be exercised in

accordance with law and as per the applicable policy/instructions. In case the petitioner has some adverse medical circumstances, then it is for her to

file representation in that regard to her employer.

Therefore, in the instant case also, it is open for the petitioner to submit a representation to respondent No.2 highlighting her medical condition within a

period of one week from today. In case the petitioner files a representation within this period, then the same shall be decided by the respondent, on its

own merit and without disturbing the impugned transfer order insofar as respondent No.3 is concerned (which is the result of implementation of

judgment in CWP No.4507 of 2020), within a period of two weeks thereafter. It will be open for the petitioner to avail leave of the kind due during the

aforesaid period.

With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

Copy dasti