Supreme CourtDivision Bench

Dina Nath Singh vs State of Bihar

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 13 December 2002 · Citation: (2003) 1 PLJR 284

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Rajendra Babu, J · P. Venkatararna Reddi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 409
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 1327 of 2002 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 2954 of 2002)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 182 words
1.

Leave granted.

2.

A charge-sheet was laid before the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jehanabad for an offence arising u/s 409 of IPC on the allegation that certain quantity of cement valued at Rs. 83,167.75 was purchased and the same was not used for Makhmilpur Were Project scheme but was used for another scheme and the expenditure was shown wrongly under the scheme in question. That was the gist of the charge sheet by terming it as temporary misappropriation. If that was so, the Respondent ought to have applied its mind considering whether the sanction should be granted or not. Learned Magistrate should not have taken cognizance of the matter without due sanction. The charge-sheet itself discloses that the cement in question had been utilised in a different scheme which was also a government scheme; though it was without sanction.

3.

In that view of the matter we allow this appeal, set aside the order of the High Court and that of the Magistrate and quash the proceedings. However, it is open to the Respondent to proceed further in accordance with law.