High CourtsSingle Bench

Dinesh vs State Of Rajasthan And Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 3 January 2024 · Citation: (2024) 01 RAJ CK 0011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Garg, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(1)(R)(S), 3(2)(5)(5A), 14A · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 307, 323, 325 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 2430 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 465 words

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

The instant second appeal has been filed under Section 14-A of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.163/2022, Police Station Kotwali Pali, for the offence under Sections 307, 325, 323/34 of IPC, and Sections 3(1)(R)(S), 3(2)(5)(5A) of SC/ST Act against the order dated 20.10.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Pali whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

The first appeal of the appellant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 22.11.2022 with liberty to file a fresh bail application after recording the statement of injured-Mukesh.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that statement of injured- Mukesh has been recorded before the trial court as PW-2 and according to his statement, present appellant inflicted head injury to him, thereafter, all other accused persons caused injuries to him. Counsel further submitted that as per injury report of injured Mukesh, head injury is found to be simple in nature but he received eighth rib fractures. Counsel argued that there is not specific allegation against the present appellant for causing chest injury to the injured. Furthermore, statement of Doctor has also been recorded before the trial Court as PW-3 and in cross-examination, he specifically mentioned that none of the injuries is found sufficient to cause death. The accused-appellant is in judicial custody since 27.04.2022 and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. He further submits that the learned court below has grossly erred in law and facts as well in declining to release the appellant on bail. Therefore, it is prayed that the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-appellant.

Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that the order rejecting the application for bail filed on behalf of the appellant, cannot be sustained and deserves to be set aside.

Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 20.10.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Pali is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Dinesh S/o Babu Lal, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.163/2022, Police Station Kotwali Pali, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.