High CourtsSingle Bench

Dinesh vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 11 July 2019 · Citation: (2019) 07 RAJ CK 0033

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Garg, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 397, 401, 457
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 701 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 503 words

Petitioner has filed this criminal revision petition under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. to assail the impugned judgment dated 24.04.2019 passed by Learned

Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases, Jodhpur (for short, ‘learned trial Court’) whereby the learned trial Court rejected the application under Section

457 Cr.P.C., moved by the petitioner for releasing the vehicle Swift VDI bearing Registration No.RJ-14-TB-7390.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, in support of his arguments, has placed reliance on a decision of the co-ordinate Bench of this Court rendered at

Jaipur Bench in Prakash Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan reported in 2010(1) Cr.L.R.(Raj.) 507. In the aforesaid judgment, the vehicle and other articles

were seized from the accused for carrying contraband of small quantity just above the commercial quantity. It is in that background, the Court has

acceded to the prayer of the incumbent and recorded its finding that solely for the reason that the vehicle and other articles are likely to be confiscated

after trial, conditional release of the vehicle and other articles on Supurdginama and surety cannot be denied and interim custody of the vehicle and

other articles can be granted to the incumbent on certain conditions.

Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2002 (10) SCC 28 3and co-ordinate Bench of this

Court at Jaipur Bench in case of Prakash Chand (supra) has held that conditional release of the vehicle cannot be denied.

Accordingly, the instant revision petition is allowed and the order dated 24.04.2019 is hereby quashed and set aside and the vehicle Swift VDI bearing

Registration No.RJ-14-TB-7390 in question is ordered to be released on ‘supardgi’ till the completion of the trial upon following conditions:-

(a) the petitioner furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.6,00,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.3.00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial

Court undertaking to produce the Swift VDI in the Court as and when required to do so.

(b) the petitioner shall get the Swift VDI photographed showing the registration number as well as the chassis number. Such photograph shall be taken

in the presence of the Investigating Officer, to be kept on the file of the case.

(c) the personal bonds of the petitioner and bonds of sureties shall carry the photographs of the petitioner and his sureties and the bond of sureties shall

further carry the photograph of perhaps identifying them before the Court which is with full residential particulars of the sureties and the persons

identifying them.

(d) the petitioner shall undertake not to transfer the ownership of the Swift VDI and not to lease it to anyone and not to make or allow any changes in

it to be made so as to make unidentifiable.

(e) the petitioner will not allow the Swift VDI bearing Registration No.RJ-14-TB-7390 to be used for any antisocial activities including for the purpose

of carrying narcotics which may constitute offence under the NDPS Act.â€​