AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
30 paragraphs · 586 wordsSandeep Sharma, J
By way of instant suit, prayer has been made on behalf of the plaintiff for partition of the land comprising khasra No.384, khewat No. 199 min,
Khatauni No. 438, Mauza Tutu, Tehsil and District Shimla, H.P., alongwith buildings, structures standing thereon by metes and bounds and for specific
possession of the land and structures as may be allotted to the plaintiff on partition proceedings.
Defendant No.1 namely Deepak Sood, has also filed counter claim bearing Counter Claim No. 4 of 2017, seeking therein decree for permanent
perpetual prohibitory injunction in his favour and against the plaintiff and defendant No.2, restraining them from selling, transferring or alienating in any
manner their undivided shares in five storied building built upon land comprised in khewat No. 199 min, khatauni No. 438, Khasra No. 384, mauja Totu,
Tehsil and District Shimla, by further restraining the plaintiff/non-counter claimant from mparting with the possession of any portion of the third floor in
favour of the third party. Besides above, counter claimant also prayed that non-applicant/non-counterclaimant be restrained from selling, transferring
or parting with the possession of land comprised in khasra No. 381, khasra No. 383, khewat No. 199 min khatauni No. 438, mauza Totu, Tehsil and
District Shimla.
Though, written statement as well as replication in the suit and counterclaim stand filed in the suit as well as counter claim, but before issues could
be framed, parties have entered into compromise, whereby they have resolved to settle their dispute amicably inter-se them and as such, have filed
joint application bearing OMP No. 8 of 2021, under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC, praying therein to decree the suit at hand as compromised in terms of
terms and conditions contained in the application referred herein above.
Averments contained in the aforesaid application as well as terms and conditions contained therein, reveals that property sought to be partitioned by
way of instant suit has been partitioned inter-se parties to the lis by way of a family settlement dated 5.1.2021. In the aforesaid background, prayer
has been made to this court to decree the suit as compromised.
Plaintiff namely Smt. Diveshwari Sood as well as defendants namely Sh. Deepak Sood and Ms. Arti Sood, have come present in the Court. They
state on oath before this Court that they of their own volition and without there being any external pressure have entered into family settlement dated
5.1.2021, whereby they all have agreed to partition their properties, sought to be executed in the instant suit, in terms of terms and conditions contained
in the application referred herein above, which bears their signatures and they identify the same. Their separate statements made on oath are taken on
record and application bearing OMP No.8 of 2021 is ordered to be exhibited as Ext.C1 so that terms and conditions are subsequently made part of the
decree.
Consequently, in view of the, prayer made in the application as well as statements made by the parties to the lis, suit at hand is decreed as
compromised in terms of terms and conditions contained in Ext.C1 and parties undertake before this Court to adhere/abide by all terms and conditions
contained in the compromise and would take necessary steps for execution/implementation of the compromise arrived inter-se them within a period of
two months from today.
In the aforesaid terms, the present suit as well as counter claims are disposed of as compromised, so also, pending application(s), if any. Decree
sheet be prepared accordingly.
