Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Diwan Singh vs Secretary

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 22 October 2020 · Citation: (2020) 10 CAT CK 0120

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narasimha Reddy, J · Aradhana Johri, Member (A)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 1637 Of 2020, Miscellaneous Application No. 1042 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 186 words

L. Narasimha Reddy, J

1.

The applicant has filed M.A with a prayer to condone the delay 1995 days in filing the O.A. The applicant intends to challenge the order dated

10.02.2009, through which he is said to have denied the benefits of 3rd Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme. The reason for delay

stated by the applicant is that he retired from service in the year 2012 and ever since, his wife was suffering from various ailments.

2.

Respondents filed a reply opposing the M.A.

3.

We heard Mr. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. Ashish Rai, learned counsel for respondents, at length, through video

conferencing.

4.

Though the applicant has stated that the delay is of 1995 days, it is much more than that. The delay is nearly 11 years. The order was passed on

10.02.2009, at a time when the applicant was in sevice. He retired three years thereafter. Even for the best of reasons, the delay cannot be condoned.

5.

M.A is accordingly dismissed. As a result, the O.A also stands dismissed.

There shall be no order as to costs.