Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Dl Gtpl Broadband Pvt Ltd vs Digital Entertainment Optical Networks Pvt Ltd

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 3 February 2022 · Citation: (2022) 02 TDSAT CK 0015

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shiva Kirti Singh, Chairperson · Subodh Kumar Gupta, Member
CASE NUMBER
Broadcasting Petition Nos. 638, 639 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 161 words

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Today also nobody appears for the respondent. The prayer for ex-parte hearing has been renewed on

the ground that notice has been validly served on 3.12.2021 but in spite of ample opportunity, respondent has avoided to appear. In the aforesaid

facts, the payer for ex-parte hearing deserves to be allowed. However, it is noted that the sole respondent - Digital Entertainment Optical Networks

Private Limited is only an agent of B4U Television Network India Limited (B4U) who is the service provider as a broadcaster. It would be proper

to add B4U Network India Limited also as a respondent.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has agreed to implead B4U, let that be done and amended memo of parties be filed within one week. Let

notice be issued upon the newly added respondent (R2), email and dasti in addition. Affidavit of service should be filed within four weeks.

Post the matter under the same head on 7.3.2022.