AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 107 wordsArindam Lodh, J
Heard Mr. C. S. Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, learned G.A. appearing for the respondents-State and Mr. R. G. Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-TPSC.
Let a notice be issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a rule should not be issued as prayed for; and/or as to why such further order/s should not be passed as to this court may seem fit and proper.
Notice is made returnable within 6(six) weeks.
Since all the respondents have already entered their appearance, no formal notice is called for.
List the matter on 03.03.2023.