High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 02 UK CK 0074

Dr. Hemant Gupta vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 17 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. K. Mishra, J · N.S. Dhanik, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (CRL) No. 263 Of 2022

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 222 words

S.K. Mishra, J

1.

In this Criminal Writ Petition, the petitioner being a Doctor has prayed for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to provide

adequate police protection to the petitioner and his family. It is stated by the petitioner that because of the nature of work, i.e. being a Doctor in public

service, he has to come across various unknown persons, and he is also getting continuous threatening calls. So, it is submitted that he should be given

protection by the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Haridwar. The petitioner has already made a representation to the respondent no. 2 in this

regard.

2.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, District-Haridwar, is, therefore, directed to immediately provide police protection to the petitioner. He shall

also take inputs from the Superintendent of Police, Roorkee Rural, District Haridwar and the Station House Officer, P.S. Kotwali Gangnahar, and

shall take a decision whether further police protection should be granted to the petitioner, or not.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that within three days, he will produce a copy of this order, along with a copy of the Writ Petition,

before the respondent no. 2.

4.

With such directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

5.

Urgent certified copy of this judgment be granted to the parties on proper application.