Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Dr. Hirdaya Hulas Nag vs Union Of India & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 18 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 CAT CK 0102

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narasimha Reddy, J · Aradhana Johri, Member (A)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 3060 Of 2018, Miscellaneous Application No. 3423 Of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 102 words

L. Narasimha Reddy, J

1.

We heard the OA at some length. During the course of the hearing of the OA, it emerged that certain developments have taken place ever since the OA is filed. Noticing that, counsel for the applicant sought permission of the Tribunal to withdraw the OA after obtaining instructions from his client, without prejudice to the rights of the applicant to file a fresh OA.

2.

Permission is accorded and the OA is allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open to the applicant to file a fresh OA. There shall be no order as to costs.