High CourtsDivision Bench(2012) 03 SHI CK 0202

Dr. Jatinder Kumar Parmar vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 14 March 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, J · Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 1308 of 2012-A

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 331 words

Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.—The Writ Petition is filed mainly with the following prayers:

"(i). That Annexure P-2 and P-4 may kindly be quashed and set aside and further, the petitioner be granted the relief in view of the judgment already passed by this Hon''ble Court in C.W.P. (T) No. 14228/2008 titled as Nek Ram vs. State of H.P. as well as C.W.P. (T) No. 16184/2008, titled as Dr. Tarsem Lal vs. State of H.P. & Ors.

(ii) That the respondents be directed to pay the revised pay scale from the initial date of appointment of the petitioner in view of Annexure P-1 and pay scale as revised from time to time including merger of D.A. enhanced from ti8me to time with all consequential benefits."

According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP (T) No. 14232 of 2008, titled as Nek Ram & others Versus State of H.P. & others, decided on 17.11.2009. If that be so, similar treatment shall also be extended to the petitioner herein also, as extended to the petitioners in the above referred decision, in case the petitioner is also similarly situated, within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and 2 copy of the judgment, referred to above, by the petitioner before the second respondent/competent authority. We also make it clear that in case subject matter is pending before the Apex Court, the implementation of this judgment need only be subject to the final out come of the said case, within another two months. So far as the case of the petitioner for grant of revised pay scale is concerned, the same be considered within a further period of two months after the decision rendered by this Court in LPA No. 105 of 2010.

2.

The Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.