AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
8 paragraphs · 339 wordsHeard Virendra Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Harsh Singh, learned counsel for the University and Mr. Jai Prabhat Kishore, learned AC to SC 13 for the University.
2.Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner informs this Court that the petitioner has already filed detailed representations before the Registrar of the Magadh University, which have been brought on record by way of Annexures 5 and 6. The learned counsel further submits that the said representations of the petitioner have not been disposed of till date.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the University informs this Court that the immediate steps will be taken by the Registrar of the University by passing a reasoned order and he will disburse all the dues admissible in accordance with law, as claimed by the petitioner, within a period of three weeks from the date of passing of this order. It is also informed that funds have already been received in the account of the University and certain dues have also been paid to the petitioner.
The Vice-Chancellor, Registrar and Finance Officer of Magadh University, Bodh Gaya must ensure to comply with the direction of this Court contained in CWJC No. 6852 of 2021 (Lilawati Mishra vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) by facilitating speedy redressal of the genuine grievance and prevent unnecessary litigation.
The Vice Chancellor and the Registrar of the University are required to personally approach the Additional Chief Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government of Bihar, who will at least ensure disbursal of fund, which is required by the University for the payment to be made to the petitioner.
Entire admissible dues on account of retiral benefit must be paid to the petitioner after examining his claim within a period of three weeks.
In case, the order is not complied with, the petitioner may file an application for initiating a proceeding of contempt for willful disobedience of this order.
With the above observation/direction, the present writ petition is allowed.
