High CourtsSingle Bench

Dr. P.Sreeramulu Reddy vs M. Krishna

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 15 April 2021 · Citation: (2021) 04 KAR CK 0094

HON’BLE JUDGES
N.S. Sanjay Gowda, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 1694 Of 2021 (CPC)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 351 words

N.S. Sanjay Gowda, J

1.

By the impugned order an injunction is granted restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment

of the suit schedule property.

2.

At Paragraph 3 of the impugned order, it is stated that the defendant appeared through his counsel on 03.06.2019 and the Court had ordered that

objections were not filed on 13.08.2019. It is therefore, clear that an order of injunction was granted in the absence of any objections by the defendant.

3.

Learned counsel for the respondent also submits that the appellant has in fact filed O.S.No.25529/2021 in which a prayer for declaration is also

made. He submits that in the said suit, an application has been filed by the appellant seeking for an order of injunction.

4.

having regard to the fact that no objections were filed to I.A.No.I and also having regard to the fact that the appellant has himself filed

O.S.No.25529/2021 for declaration, I am of view, it would be in the interest of justice if the impugned order is set-aside and the trial Court is directed

to reconsider I.A.No.I afresh after giving the appellant an opportunity of filing the objections.

5.

As it is brought to the notice of this court that a suit for declaration in O.S.No.25529/2021 has been filed in respect of the very same property, it

would also be in the interest of justice to direct that O.S.No.25529/2021 be withdrawn from CCH-58 and be transferred to XXXIX Additional City

Civil Judge (CCH-30), Bengaluru.

6.

The trial Court shall reconsider I.A.No.I and also the application filed in O.S.No.25529/2021 and pass appropriate orders. Till the said applications

are considered, both the parties shall maintain status-quo.

7.

It is stated that O.S.No.199/2019 is posted on 16.04.2021. The trial Court is directed to secure the records in O.S.No.25529/2021 and dispose of the

application filed therein and also I.A.No.I filed in O.S.No.199/2019 on or before 24.04.2021.

8.

If any application is filed in O.S.No.199/2019 seeking to restrain the respondent from putting up any further construction, the same shall also be

considered by the trial Court along with I.A.No.I.