High CourtsSingle Bench

Dukhi vs Emperor

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 26 April 1923 · Citation: AIR 1924 All 141 : 74 Ind. Cas. 448

HON’BLE JUDGES
Daniels, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 106, 352, 506
RESULT
Dismissed
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 195 words

Daniels, J.—This case has been referred by the learned Sessions Judge at Allahabad on the ground that an order u/s 106 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was passed without jurisdiction. A case under sections 352 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code was before a Magistrate of the Second Class. Being of opinion that the accused should be bound over u/s 106 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, he referred the case to, the Joint Magistrate. The Joint Magistrate passed an order u/s 106 but did not deal with the substantive charge and on his sending the record back the accused were convicted by the Second Class Magistrate in whose Court the case originally was. Under these circumstances, the learned Sessions Judge is right in saying that the Joint Magistrate acted without jurisdiction. The learned Sessions Judge appears to be of opinion that the order was a proper order on the merits but he has not thought it necessary, to ask this Court to restore the order in the exercise of its revisional jurisdiction u/s 106(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. I accept the reference and set aside the order passed u/s 106.