High Courts

Dwarka Prasad and Another vs Ojha Dariao Singh

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 12 April 1929 · Citation: AIR 1929 All 560

RESULT
Dismissed

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 155 words
1.

This is an appeal against an order of remand of a District Judge in appeal which was filed before him against a decree of an Assistant Collector. A preliminary objection has been taken by Dr. Agarwala that the Tenancy Act 3 of 1926 does not provide for an appeal against an order of remand passed by a District Judge in appeal. u/s 240, Tenancy Act, no appeal lay from any decree or order passed by any Court under the Tenancy Act except as provided by the Act. Section 242 provides that an appeal shall lie to the District Judge from the decree of an Assistant Collector in certain suits. The present suit was one of those. We cannot find any provision in the Tenancy Act which allows an appeal to this Court from an order passed by a District Judge in appeal. We therefore, allow the preliminary objection and dismiss the appeal with costs.