High CourtsSingle Bench

Ekta vs Dheeraj Kumar

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 10 July 2019 · Citation: (2019) 07 RAJ CK 0029

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.K. Lohra, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Section 24 · Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 9 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 125 · Protection Of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — Section 12 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 406, 498A
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Transfer Application No. 148 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 360 words

Petitioner-wife has preferred this petition under Section 24 CPC for seeking transfer of Civil Application No.323/2017 (Dheeraj Kumar Vs. Ekta),

pending before Family Court, Hanumangarh to Family Court, Churu, which is filed by respondent-husband under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act,

1955 for seeking restitution of conjugal rights.

It is, inter-alia, averred in the petition that petitioner is having her permanent abode at Churu and Hanumangarh is about 300km far from Churu. Apart

from that, another ground set out in the petition is that at her behest, a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. is filed against respondent-husband for

seeking maintenance besides a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. It is also pleaded that an

FIR is registered against respondent-husband at the behest of petitioner attributing offence under Sections 498A & 406 IPC and after investigation,

charge-sheet has already been filed against him and presently Criminal Case No.466/2018 is pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu.

At the threshold, on 03.10.2018, notices were issued to respondent and further proceedings in the case pending before Family Court, Hanumangarh

stayed. The notices issued to respondent were served as per report dated 16.11.2018 but despite service none has appeared on his behalf. On

20.11.2018, 05.12.2018, 02.01.2019, 16.01.2019, 01.02.2019, 19.02.2019, 08.03.2019, 01.04.2019 & 22.04.2019 nobody was present on behalf of

respondent yet while deferring the matter, interim order was extended.

Today also nobody is present on behalf of respondent.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and upon examining the grounds set out in the petition for transfer, precisely, harping on the difficulties

faced by petitioner for attending proceedings at Family Court, Hanumangarh, besides, pendency of other cases at Churu against respondent-husband,

in totality of circumstances and the fact that respondent has not come forward to contest the petition, I feel persuaded to accept this petition.

Accordingly, the instant transfer petition is allowed and Civil Misc. Application No.323/2017 (Dheeraj Kumar Vs. Ekta), pending before Family Court,

Hanumangarh is hereby ordered to be transferred to Family Court, Churu.

The learned Family Court, Hanumangarh may ensure sending of entire record of the case to learned Family Court, Churu forthwith.