AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
1 paragraphs · 132 wordsDaniels, J.—This is a reference by the learned Sessions Judge of Benares in a case under the Workman''s Breach of Contract Act, 1859, as amended by Act XII of 1920. It is admitted that the Magistrate omitted, before ordering the complainant to pay compensation u/s 2B of the Act, to call on him to show cause. I accordingly set aside the order of compensation passed and direct the Magistrate to do now what he should have done in the first instance, namely to call upon the complainant to show cause why he should not be ordered to pay compensation. The Magistrate will then pass final orders after considering any cause that may have been shown. The amount of compensation, if already deposited, will remain in deposit pending the decision of the case.