High CourtsFull Bench

Emperor vs D, a Pleader

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 5 February 1934 · Citation: AIR 1934 Cal 794

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.C. Ghose, J · Lort-Williams, J · Lord-Williams, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 131 words

M.C. Ghose, J.—Upon hearing Dr. Basak in support of the reference and Mr. Mukerji on behalf of the pleader against whom these proceedings were started, we are of opinion, upon consideration of all the circumstances, that it is not established beyond reasonable doubt that the pleader D actually signed the petition of compromise which was put in. It is true that the Munsif, who tried the suit, found against the pleader but, on appeal, the Additional District Judge disbelieved the evidence and came to the conclusion, as a final judge of fact, that it was not established that D signed the petition. In this view of the matter we are of opinion that the charge framed against him has not been established. The reference is rejected.

Lort-Williams, J.

2.

I agree.