High CourtsSingle Bench

Emperor vs Kale

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 13 September 1922 · Citation: (1923) ILR (All) 143 : 74 Ind. Cas. 270

HON’BLE JUDGES
Stuart, J
RESULT
Dismissed
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 139 words

Stuart, J.—This is an application from the Sessions Judge of Meerut requesting me to set aside a conviction passed by his predecessor and affirmed by Piggott, J., in appeal, on the ground that on certain materials that have since come to the knowledge of the District Magistrate there is a doubt of the convict''s guilt.

2.

This is not a matter which I can possibly take up in revision. Even if I myself had passed the order dismissing the appeal I could not revise it and I certainly cannot revise the order of another Judge of this Court. There can be no revision in the matter.

3.

I return the record to the District Magistrate in order that he may refer the matter to the Local Government who, have power under Chapter XXIX of the Code of Criminal Procedure.