AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 115 wordsSo far as the right to the value of improvements goes, there is no distinction between a tenant under ""kanom"" and under ""verurnpattom."" As
pointed out in Achilla v. Kali ILR 7 Mad. 545 the right. to receive such compensation becomes perfected only at the time of eviction, and subject
to the customary incidents attending to the tenure. Consequently the right of the landlord to set off against the value of the improvements any rent
due to him under the lease must prevail against any alienation made by the tenant of his right to compensation when it is in an inchoate state.
The second appeal therefore fails, and it is dismissed with costs.