Farman vs State Of Uttarakhand

Alok Kumar Verma, J

Present Application has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of Anticipatory Bail in connection with the Case Crime No.304 of 2022 (Criminal Case No.1644 of 2023), registered at police station Gangnahar, District Haridwar under Section 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007.

As per the First Information Report dated 12.05.2022, Sub-Inspector Ashish Kumar, informant, was busy in his patrolling duty along with other police personnel. They raided the spot on a secret information. Five persons were present on the spot. Police party recovered 450 Kg. beef and cutting tools from the spot. Police arrested two persons. Three persons managed to escape from the spot. The arrested persons told the police that they, along with Farman (present applicant), had slaughtered two bulls. Upon conclusion of the investigation, charge-sheet was filed.

Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated by the co-accused persons. He was not present on the spot. Nothing was recovered from his possession. He has no criminal antecedents. He is a permanent resident of District Haridwar. Therefore, there is no possibility of his absconding. Charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. The said offence is triable by Magistrate.

Mrs. Manisha Rana Singh, A.G.A., has opposed the Anticipatory Bail Application.

Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, applicant- Farman is directed to be released on Anticipatory Bail, in the event of his arrest, on furnishing his personal bond of Rs. 30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each in the like amount on the following conditions:-

(i) Applicant shall attend the Trial court regularly and he shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment;

(ii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case.

(iii) Applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Trial Court.

It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the concerned authority will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.

Anticipatory Bail Application (No.945 of 2023) stands disposed of accordingly.